*******************************************************************************
Hi!

I do not think that disqualifies me as a philosopher. I spend many evenings playing chess and discussing philosophy with people who teach it. One of them coined a term that I use frequently "vernacular philosophy". Many great classical musicians are academically trained, but not one of them ( with the possible exception of Sting) ever made much of an impression in vernacular music. Something we both do from time to time is conduct what we call "philosophy busking" sort of going back to the Socratic format of meeting in the agora and discussing whatever those who join in feel like discussing. I feel that "debating” anything is really a waste of time and energy, it is a complete waste and misuse of the government's time in parliament and ,truth be known ,has never changed anything in human affairs.

Debate itself is generally an adversarial pitting of one belief against another or some futile attempt to overthrow the wilful ignorance of a "true believer". Since beliefs are never inherently and of their own nature established facts what would be the point of that?

I remember very well the day in philosophy class, some of the students, me included, were trying to persuade our professor to read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance "by Robert M Pirsig. ( It will certainly be remembered in history as a great work of 20th century vernacular philosophy). The old fart just scoffed at the idea that anything with a title like that could not be serious philosophy. I said to him that one of the issues the book addresses is the decay in the quality of our lives because a belief that quality is a subjective and not objective notion has arisen.

He immediately scoffed and said that there was no question or issue there and that quality was a purely subjective matter. I let him spiel for about fifteen minutes the I asked him:

"If that is the case, upon what basis do you mark our papers?"

He rolled his eyes and grinned and said: "Ok I'll read it"

Truth is never argued or debated. Only opinions.

I have no difficulty, cause or objection to anything you have said. You are at liberty to report the fact I stated that wherever you wish.

Now, wasn't that easy?

My difficulty with what you have said is in the practical realities of the political struggle that it spawned. The sectarian breakdown of orthodox feminism is inevitable and actually support for orthodox feminism is rapidly in decline. I am aware of this.

The most aggressive elements of the movement managed to commandeer, occupy, and "take ownership" of the governance and political direction of the movement. That is a problem far beyond the personal beliefs or the personal efforts of people trying to live their philosophy.

I opted to join this rather radical group of masculinists simply because their leader made me admit to myself that I am no longer able to distinguish friend from foe and that I should turn away from women and encourage other men to do so until such time as that distinction can readily be made.

Right now I am in an awkward and precarious position. Letting the culture of misandry continue to flourish is simply not acceptable. I have my two grandsons to consider.

One of my colleagues compared it to cockroaches in a kitchen. They scurry into sanctuary when you come after them but as soon as the lights are out they are back. Another one compared it to Australian brush fire that continually re-ignites unless you piss on every last ember.

I am not angry when I tell you any of this. It all makes me very sad. Everything that I have ever loved or cared about has been sullied by the efforts of women who hate men. I have been walking this earth for more than half a century and I have not been leaving a trail of wronged or betrayed women in my wake. I am a good and decent person. Those who are obsessed with making me a Jew in Germany have earned my enmity.

As absurd as it might seem, in Canada right now, even just this mail transmission I am making to you, could get me on a watch list of the RCMP as a "hate criminal".

If challenged in court for the right to claim that they speak for women collectively, orthodox feminists would be thwarted. Even if I stood before a jury of twelve women who are strangers to me, I know very well that there would be at least one such as you in the twelve who might have the personal integrity to hang the jury.

The feminists who commandeered positions of influence in the government, not one of them was elected nor would they have any hope of winning an election, now want special status under the hate laws because they fear those who they have aggrieved. They are calling themselves an "identifiable group".

Tell me, Amy, how does one identify a feminist? Does she have three tits and two cleavages? Even the lesbians who warn off the advances of men by wearing marine sergeant haircuts and little round Leon Trotski glasses do not necessarily actively promote a culture of misandry. The only time I have ever been able to identify a feminist is when she opens her mouth to spit spray some misandrist sentiment at me out of the blue and unprovoked. What is most distressing about these women is that they must all have fingers too big to fit in their own nostrils because they are awfully obsessed with picking other people's noses.

I am afraid that because your philosophical movement harbours people who can reasonably be seen as enemies to the peace and good order of society feminism will be subject to our bombardment until such time as you give them up.

Like I said before, you have permission to dialogue with me here or on the blog. I will let the others know. Please allow a week before going on the blog, it will take me that long to make the others comfortable with it.

As for your friend tell her to loose the attitude if she is wise and prudent. We are actively seeking enemies to make an example of. And as I have said elsewhere, my skill at feeding crow and humble pie to those who manage to intimidate others with their butch strut is exactly why I was invited to be an author in that blog.

********************************************************************************

After spending four and a half years at a feminist university, after having had three live in relationships with militant vanguard feminists and having been sneered at for no good reason over the tops of feminist books. After having attended the funerals of people who have committed suicide because of this gender war. After seeing an innocent young man railroaded for rape he did not commit. After seeing the consequences of trivializing abortion and divorce to the level of a haircut ( which at one point in time I would have argued strongly in favour of).After having been cheated out of a career that would have put me on easy street three times by affirmative action. I can honestly say that I would rather be shot by feminists than ruled by them.

Feminism is a recycling of Marxism. Feminism is Marxism in drag. No system of enforced egalitarianism has ever worked. People simply are not equal. If you are so certain the men's rights movement is wrong why do you even pay any attention to it? Do you think people are fools who can easily be misled?

I have joined one of the most militant groups. I am renowned for my nasty vitriolic style. Do you know why I do that? Because when you express your reasonable concerns in a reasonable manner the best you can hope for is to be relegated to a quasi child status and dismissively ignored.

I have successfully brought about better behaviour in people by insulting them on many occasions.

When Oskar Schindler (the only member of the Nazi Party to plant a memorial olive tree on the Avenue of the Righteous Among Nations in Tel Aviv) made his speech he said that he had always been an Epicurean and savoured the good things in life. He also saw nothing wrong with being an opportunist. He said that many people who had power did not know how to enjoy it. He said:

If no peaceful democratic means can be found to cast them down from power, there are indeed men in this movement who will stop talking and resort to partisan and gangster type activities to overthrow them by force.

*******************************************************************************

"And the Gileadites took the passage of Jordan before the Ephraimites: and it was so, that when those Ephriamites which were escaped said, Let me go over; that the men of Gilead said unto him, Art thou an Ephraimite? If he said; Nay; Then said they unto him, say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at the time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand." --- Judges 12 vs. 5,6

From this passage in the Bible was coined the term "shibboleth" meaning something that you say which tells where you are coming from which might identify you as a political enemy. Usually I can identify an indoctrinated feminist within the first few moments of conversation. There are certain points of lingo and jingo and dogma that give it away.

It is not reasonable to expect that men will give up sex, particularly younger men. However they need not exchange half of their net worth for sex if they refrain from sharing the same address with a woman. "No fault” divorce and divorce being trivialised to the level of a haircut and common-law equivalency after one year of co-habitation makes sharing your address with a woman one of the most hazardous things you can do.

Not one member of MGTOW was ever recruited by a man. I was invited to attend their secret site and met the world's front runners of the MRA movement because they had read my posts on other sites. At first I thought they were nuts. But when their position was explained and clarified, I realised that it (their philosophy) was exactly what I was already doing.

Men are sexual sycophants. That is why feminism occupied our world with practically no resistance. The irony is that the leadership of feminism is virtually all lesbian misandrists. We now live in a society where lesbians who make no secret of the fact that they hate men and deem the "nuclear family" (said as if it were nuclear warhead) to be the core of the oppression of women are now the pundits of our family law system.

If the thread becomes interesting I will ask your permission to post it on the blog.

The philosopher John Stuart Mill was the one who got this whole equality thing rolling. John himself was anything but equal, he was probably one of the most intelligent people who ever lived and displayed that at an incredibly early age. But what he observed was that conventional thinking about eugenics, breeding, and hereditary aristocracy and class privilege did not produce the best leadership in society. A free society of equal legal entitlement and equal opportunity would be the best thing for all concerned. Not too long after, that notion got perverted by Karl Marx into a belief that everyone is inherently equal and that all of the world's goodies should be divided up like cake at a birthday party.

To the notion that men and women must be equal by all measures I say my left gluteus maximus is not equal in size or symmetry to my right gluteus maximus but I still manage to walk straight.

When I was attending Mount Saint Vincent I had a math prof who was the only cum laud mathematics PhD that Dalhousie has ever graduated. He is a world class mathematician and one Hell of a fun pedagogue to boot. He got shafted for tenure for no good reason other than being male. Enforced egalitarianism is actually brain haemorrhaging our intellectual and academic community in the name of a highly perverted notion of justice.

http://www.warbirdforum.com/illu.htm

http://hkkk.fi/~yrjola/war/faf/juutilai.html

Handsome brute wasn’t he? Loved the woods and loved to take his sons into the back country of his beloved Finland. Also danced the tango as well as he did everything else (much to his wife’s delight). I wonder if he would have been a bigger hit with the ladies if he learned the ukulele and how to sing “Tiptoe Through the Tulips” in a high warbling falsetto?

Many people look at the youth today and label them disrespectful little thugs. While it is true that the youth are indeed direspectful, they were raised to be that way due to feminism. Feminism has produced numerous fallacies and promoted violence against men along with extreme hatred of men. The feminists were nothing and still are nothing but spoilt, rebellious, evil, sadistic, direspectful, useless, parasitic, disgusting, pathetic, beasts and that is the reason why children look up to them.

Children will always have the desire to be rebellious, and they will support and beast that leads a rebellion against authority. Based on that, feminists should have been censored back when the first feminist mustant first evolved. The foundation of feminism is based on corruption, deception, fascism, sexism, marxism, and parasitism. Feminism has corrupted the minds of billions of people through fallacious statements.

Feminists have made up lies about domestic violence, rape, equal pay, military, sexual harassment, ability to work, ability to obtain an education. Scientific studies along with police reports offer comprehensive proof that males at least 50% of domestic violence victims are males, with females initiating the majority of domestic violence. Scientific studies along with DNA testiging prove that 50% of rape accusations are false.

Equal pay laws have been in existence since the 1960's and comparisons between males and females of the same employment status show that females are paid slightly more than males are it's only the fact females in general work less and are lesser qualified, therefore they do not advance as far in their career because they're not as competent as the males, that overall males tend to earn more because males work their way into obtaining the more responsible and higher paying jobs. It's not the fault of males that most females are not as competent or as skillful as males.

Not a single female died fighting for her nation during the 20th century, yet feminists have claimed that millions of women died fighting for their nation during world war 2. In fact laws prevent females from being put in the battle lines during any war and it was the feminists who argued furiously when the Government thought about changing these laws.

Females have been able to obtain an education in during the middle ages, and they were allowed to work as well. Ann Lockwood became a teacher in the 19th century, she later became a politican, she had her own political party and ran for the Presidency of the USA, she also argued as a lawyer in the Supreme Court in 1877. Prior to the industrialised revolution females worked quite often. But when the industrialised revolution took place females no longer wished to work because the work became dangerous, unpleasant, and harsh. Scientific studies show that 60% of sexual harassment accusations are false.

Based on that, everything that feminists preach are blatant fallacies. They have totally shown no respect to history, in fact they have defamed history by replacing it with fallacies. Based on that the feminists set the tone for the youth to develop a lack of respect for history, for society, and for the very people who worked so hard to advance society. The millions of brave men and boys who fought and died in wars just to protect the women in their society, are not being shown any gratitude for their great sacrificies. Instead the feminists are spitting in their faces by defaming their reputation as they have stated blatant lies about them.

Feminism is the most evil movement to have ever existed on this Earth.